So I found one good link from psycho's blog: Guess-the-Google.
I've decided this is an acceptable way to pass 15 minutes of time, especially when such time includes procratinating on finals studying.
My high in seven games was 383 (including a "how do we do this?" Game One).
And I beat Baker 4-3 in our series of Guess-the-Google high scores, capping off a remarkable early 3-1 series deficit.
9 comments:
The only thing remarkable about the whole series we played is that I actually wasted part of my life playing the game. If memorizing images is your thing and you enjoy waiting in suspense on whether or not the game is going to freeze on you in between guesses then this is definitely something you need to check out.
ps: I sound like a kid on Reading Rainbow trying to get you to read a book. Awesome.
TWMHIT.
It's more about being a Google master and less about the freezing part.
You are just disappointed in yourself for letting me back into the series. I would feel dejected if I were you too. It's cool though, we live and play another day right?
Reading Rainbow always came after some show I always watched as a kid. I can't think of the show though, does anyone remember the PBS lineup from about twelve years ago?
By the way, Chris and I are in the same computer lab 4 feet apart from each other. There is no need for spoken words though (but then Chris starts singing). Instead we communicate through this blog. GO PISTONS!
I see you are not an "ignorant fan" in that you cheer for the Pistons.
If only we could have recorded pelegray's "rebuttal" (does it even qualify as an argument) to my post to Baker and I tonight.
Apparently we're ignorant because we cheer for hometown teams. He says he likes the Pistons because of how they play, but WON'T like them anymore if they lose. He says he likes the Yankees because they always win but WOULD like them if they started to lose.
And that isn't even the tip of the iceberg.
Not even close. I think someone is hopping on more than the bandwagon....
gosh, once again my arguement is not properly edified. It was more of a joke to piss of Chris but thinking about it, it does make since. I did not mean ignorant but I did say irrational. You know rationality, thinking things out. I like the pistons because they are like detroit, a bunch of hard workers who aren't very pretty. I think about that and choose to like them for what they are. my arguement is that sport teams are composed of players who often move all over the place. To sit down and say I follow all teams from Colorado and am fans of them uses less rationality then thinking about things you like in teams and then matching them up with teams that are out there. Yeah, I like the Yankees, why do you hate them? That seems like the popular thing to do. Besides the yankees are a team that puts something out every year. Largely because they have the money because of decades of being, well they have iconic status so, the Yankees. They have respectibility year in and year out, granted the moment A-rod did the slap they lost a lot, but they got A-rod, and Johnson. There like the Washington Redskins and the New York Knicks the only difference is they win. Money isn't always the answer it takes more to consistantly build a winner.
Just a quick note on your 2005 NYY (They are currently cellar dwellers with Tampa Bay):
11-18 (.379), 8 GB, 3-7 in their last 10 (including a three game slide).
Does that mean your new favorite team is the ChiSox?
There not celler dwellers anymore cowboy!!!
Post a Comment